🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi said only diplomacy worked, and disclosed fresh requests had been made by go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to authorize the global atomic watchdog to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Path

Araghchi is treading a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be operating from a stance of vulnerability, and he emphatically stated that Iran had come out more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an absolute privilege to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, attacked Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the American leader declaring the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, Western states employed their right to restore international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "perfect agreement" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that US nuclear scientists could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives asserted three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Current Position

Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be reintroduced in some form if talks resume.

Trump in recent days said he had been getting signals that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Tehran representatives state they are not yet getting coherent offers from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been criticized of passivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to portray the US as a controlling nation that abuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister stated the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be settled by military means. He said the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a truce.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with total Washington understanding and coordination, making confidence challenging to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Answer

Araghchi stated: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had consistently tried to enforce their demands during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be alive and stays the final answer to resolve conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the language of respect and respect, they will get a reply in the equivalent approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iranian officials as the battle of restoration and rebuilding, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's military capacities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the weaknesses of the adversary."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and machinery, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this attack."